Sunday, February 20, 2011

Art and Aesthetics

I could write an explanation of why I haven't posted since October, and give witty accounts of my life during the large span, but I won't.

I was in Mass this morning, being Sunday not such a surprise.  I was in Indianapolis--surprise!

The Church of St. John the Evangelist was incredibly beautiful.  Right downtown, a block from Lucas Oil Stadium where someone named "Peyton" apparently lives.  The Church has the distinction in my experience of being a rarity indeed: it's very old, although I'm not sure how old.  That's not what makes it rare to me though, but rather the fact that it appears much the same as it probably did 60 years ago.  What's this?  Side altars?  High altars still in place? An altar rail?  Original stained glass?  Yes to all!

This post is about art, and aesthetics, and beauty, and this morning.  These all collided at approximately 10:30am Eastern Standard Time in that old Indianapolis Church.

As I was kneeling in prayer, thanking and praising Our God for His gifts to me, for the Interview Weekend I was blessed to attend, and for the beautiful surroundings etc. I was struck to hear the Organ begin playing.  It was choir practice!  This is the type of Church where the choir is suspended above the back of the Church in a balcony--and it's awesome to hear!  I know there are microphones and such, but these places were designed not to need microphones--there's just something about hearing the human voice in a setting like that from behind me that gets me every time.

As I was praying and listening to the choir sing something that sounded like a mix of Gregorian Chant, Aaron Copland and Samuel Barber, I was struck by truth.  There was some truth in what those notes and words were conveying, even though I couldn't understand what they were singing.  I'm sure it was English, I just wasn't paying attention because it was hard to make out.  I think the fact that I was struck by the words and the music even though I was just letting it wash over me is significant.

Right about that time, I looked up towards the sanctuary, and noticed one of the lectors going over his assigned reading at the lectern.

He was a man probably in his 60s, in a tidy suit, but not flashy.  He had deep set eyes, wrinkles, and short white hair around the crown of his head--not in the middle.  He was standing behind the lectern, staring down at the pages of the Scripture--a simple lamp illuminating the pages and him.  The look on his face was absolutely serene.  I don't how else to describe it.  At that moment, I wished I could capture it, paint it, take a picture, something!!  Even writing this seems hollow to me.  And it taught me something about art.

I've never really though about art--REALLY thought about it.  I still don't know anything about it, but I think I got closer to what the artist feels.  To capture the truth of that moment, and communicate it to someone else.  To invite the viewer to contemplate the truth expressed in the medium.  Isn't that was art does?  If so, I really like it.  If so, a lot of things I thought were art don't make the cut.

Art invites us to contemplate the truth being expressed through the painting, music, written word, whatever.  I think this is what people feel about sunsets, and sunrises; about newborn babies and such.  I think God's an artist.  I think the lot of us are pretty terrible artists, but a few of us--chosen few--have a gift, and I envy them as much as I can without getting into trouble.

I think about that man, and what that scene made me think about.  I don't know what I'd ever say to him if I met him.  I don't think I need to say anything?  That scene will never be repeated again, and even if it were, it would not do the same thing to me twice.  And that's interesting, I think.  It's like the first time you heard your favorite song--you can never again repeat that experience.  As soon as you listened to it again, the original feeling was already beginning to fade.

C.S. Lewis and many others said that this is not an accident, but is a clue that is intended to make us ask the question: why can't I hold onto that experience long-term?  His answer: because we are not made for this world and it's pleasures--but for a greater world and far greater joy than we can even imagine to imagine.  They are given to make us thirst, and thirsting realize that we will never be quenched--lest we think heaven is here.  We are given these experiences to thirst for the living God.

This post was for Kyle Sanders--thanks for encouraging me!

2 comments:

  1. Ah, yes! God is an artist and a darn good one! I mean look at the beard he gave you...

    I've never looked at art like this before. This is good stuff.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is what I've been waiting for since October, a post from Mr. Jones. I'm glad I could encourage you. Something I've learned from reading Chesterton, is that getting our thoughts out in a public forum allows us to clarify our own understanding of things. You did so yesterday, in the realm of art. If you haven't already read it, as a follow up to this insight I would suggest reading Jacques Maritain's Art and Scholasticism.
    I can't wait for the next post in .... what? ... 1,2,3,4, no 5 months. :)

    ReplyDelete